Customs rejects CBN’s e-valuator, e-invoicing policy
The Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) on Thursday reiterated its rejection of the e-valuator and e-invoicing for import and export businesses in Nigeria.
The electronic valuation and invoicing system was introduced by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) last year to create a benchmark for the calculation of import duties on cargoes coming into Nigeria and to also obtain accurate data about the country’s imports and exports.
It will be recalled that the CBN in a letter dated 8 July 2021 informed the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) of its plan to deploy a mechanism for verification of prices of goods before allocation of forex at the point of e-form M registration. The policy in summary seeks to benchmark the price of the imported and exported cargo.
However, in a statement on Thursday, Customs spokesman, Timi Bomodi, debunked claims in some sections of the media that it has accepted the new CBN policy.
The statement reads: “It has come to our attention that there are reports, suggesting the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) has acquiesced to the introduction of the e-valuator and e-invoicing for import and export businesses in Nigeria by Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). We wish to state that this is incorrect. The Service still stands by its earlier submissions on the matter, as was clearly communicated to the House of Representatives Joint Committee on Customs and Excise, Banking and Currencies on 03 March 2022.
“The move has raised objections from critical stakeholders within and outside the industry who have expressed valid concerns that require critical considerations.
“The practice world over is to domicile adjudication on Customs values for import and export within the Customs administration of every country. The NCS, undoubtedly, is alive to its statutory functions and has a vibrant Valuation Unit under the Tariff and Trade Department whose roles among others includes the proper interpretation of WCO/WTO rules and agreements concerning the valuation of goods.
“Nigeria being a member of the World Customs Organisation (WCO), World Trade Organisation (WTO) and also signatory to international trade treaties, including Article VII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade is constrained to abide by the principles contained therein.
“Article VII stipulates that the value for customs purposes of imported/exported goods should be based on the actual value paid or payable for them. This is commonly referred to as transaction value. This agreement also prescribes five other methods for arriving at Customs value where the transaction value is unacceptable. They are the transaction value of identical goods, the transaction value of similar goods, the Deductive value method, the Computed value method, and the Fallback method, applied sequentially.
“The NCS as a government agency aligns with the WTO Agreement on Customs Valuation (ACV) as it aims for a fair, uniform, and neutral system for the valuation of goods for Customs purposes. This conforms to commercial realities, and outlaws the use of assumed values for customs purposes.
“It is our view that the use of benchmarking in valuation as proposed by the CBN policy will negate the aim of the ACV and result in disputes, delays, and uncertainties.
“The WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) remains the Service’s principle guide for trade facilitation. Therefore, NCS is always seeking new approaches to enable the expedited clearance of goods from our ports by adopting new technologies, harmonizing and simplifying our procedures all of which are purposely designed to reduce cost.
“The House of Representatives Joint Committee on Customs and Excise, Banking and Currencies had directed that all agencies with defined roles in the supply chain meet to harmonize procedures with particular reference to resolving the issue of value for trade purposes. This meeting is yet to take place, therefore there could not have been any agreement supporting the CBN initiative as reported in the news.
“We look forward to the robust deliberation that is expected to occur from this meeting as directed. Until then we shall continue to abide by the principles as contained in the ACV for all import/export transactions.”